From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skiba v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 24, 2011
67 So. 3d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4D10–3810.

2011-08-24

Albert SKIBA, Appellant,v.STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06–19955CF10A.Albert Skiba, Okeechobee, pro se.Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. However, we remand the case to the trial court to correct a scrivener's error. The trial court announced that the defendant's sentences would run concurrent, but the sentence on Count IV fails to reflect that information.

Affirmed, but remanded to correct a scrivener's error.

MAY, C.J., GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Skiba v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 24, 2011
67 So. 3d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Skiba v. State

Case Details

Full title:Albert SKIBA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

67 So. 3d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Clark v. State

However, we remand for correction of scrivener's errors in the judgment and sentence which are in variance…