From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skiba v. Spanik

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 4, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-919 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-919.

October 4, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2006;

Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 18) along with a brief in support on June 12, 2006. Plaintiff has not responded. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response and brief in opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss no later than November 1, 2006. Failure to comply with this order may result in an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), and Local Rule 72.1.3, the parties are allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file an appeal from this order to the District Court. Failure to timely file an appeal may constitute a waiver of any appellate rights.


Summaries of

Skiba v. Spanik

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 4, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-919 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2006)
Case details for

Skiba v. Spanik

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SKIBA, Plaintiff, v. JOE SPANIK; CHARLIE CAMP; DAN DONNATELLA; and…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 4, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-919 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2006)