From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skenandore v. Russell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 11, 2023
3:21-cv-00330-ART-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00330-ART-CSD

10-11-2023

JONATHAN JOE SKENANDORE, Petitioner, v. PERRY RUSSELL, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

ANNE R. TRAUM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner Jonathan Joe Skenandore seeks an extension of time to file his reply in support of his amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court finds that the request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and therefore, good cause exists to grant Petitioner's motion.

It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's unopposed second motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 38) is granted. Petitioner has until December 1, 2023, to file his reply.


Summaries of

Skenandore v. Russell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 11, 2023
3:21-cv-00330-ART-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Skenandore v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN JOE SKENANDORE, Petitioner, v. PERRY RUSSELL, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 11, 2023

Citations

3:21-cv-00330-ART-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2023)