From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skelton v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 29, 1976
342 So. 2d 937 (Ala. 1976)

Summary

holding that the language, "Are you big sh* *s going to move or am I going to have to go around," deemed not "fighting words" when addressed to a police officer

Summary of this case from Parks v. City of Birmingham

Opinion

SC 2097.

October 29, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Jefferson County, William H. Cole, J.

Winston B. McCall, Jr., Birmingham, for petitioner.

No brief for City of Birmingham, respondent.


Petition of James Skelton for certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Skelton v. City of Birmingham, Ala.Cr.App., 342 So.2d 933.

Upon a consideration of the facts set out in the Court of Criminal Appeals' decision, we are of the opinion that the judgment of that court should be corrected to read "REVERSED AND RENDERED" instead of "REVERSED AND REMANDED."

This case was fully briefed in the Court of Criminal Appeals. No purpose would be served by requiring the parties to submit briefs again. Thus, the provisions of all applicable rules, specifically Rule 39 (f) and (g), ARAP (permitting briefs to be filed and oral argument to be had after petitions for writs of certiorari are granted), are suspended under the provisions of Rule 2 (b), ARAP. Pendleton v. State, 295 Ala. 327, 329 So.2d 144 (1976).

The petition for the writ of certiorari is granted and this cause remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals so that it may conform its judgment to this opinion. In re Gentry (Ex parte Charles Herbert Gentry), Ala., 333 So.2d 157 (1976); Pendleton v. State, supra.

WRIT GRANTED.

RULES SUSPENDED.

CAUSE REMANDED TO COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS TO CORRECT JUDGMENT.

HEFLIN, C.J., and JONES, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Skelton v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 29, 1976
342 So. 2d 937 (Ala. 1976)

holding that the language, "Are you big sh* *s going to move or am I going to have to go around," deemed not "fighting words" when addressed to a police officer

Summary of this case from Parks v. City of Birmingham

holding that the language, "Are you big sh* *s going to move or am I going to have to go around," deemed not "fighting words" when addressed to a police officer

Summary of this case from Walker v. Briley
Case details for

Skelton v. City of Birmingham

Case Details

Full title:In re James SKELTON v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. Ex parte James Skelton

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Oct 29, 1976

Citations

342 So. 2d 937 (Ala. 1976)

Citing Cases

T.W. v. State

The term "obscene gesture" is also used in the disorderly conduct statute (§ 13A-11-7) and has been…

Swann v. City of Huntsville

"(T)hey are those words which have a likelihood of causing a violent response by the person to whom they are…