Opinion
November 2, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).
We affirm, since we find that plaintiff's employment was terminable at will. Furthermore, we find that Weiner v McGraw-Hill, Inc. ( 57 N.Y.2d 458) is not applicable herein, since plaintiff has not presented persuasive facts which indicate that defendants made any representations to him concerning employment security.
Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.