From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skelly Oil Co. v. Odom

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 5, 1928
131 Okla. 183 (Okla. 1928)

Opinion

No. 18134

Opinion Filed June 5, 1928.

(Syllabus.)

Limitation of Actions — Syllabus Adopted.

The syllabus in No. 18246, Empire Gas Fuel Co. et al. v. Lindersmith (this day decided), 131 Okla. 183, 268 P. 218, is adopted as the syllabus in this case.

Error from District Court, Stephens County; M. W. Pugh, Judge.

Action by H. C. Odom against the Skelly Oil Company et al. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.

J. J. Hedrick, Joe S. Dickerson, Womack Brown, John Rogers, Blakeney Ambrister, and Karl Griffith, for plaintiffs in error.

H. B. Lockett, for defendant in error.


The same questions involved in this case were presented to this court in Empire Gas Fuel Co. et al. v. Lindersmith, No. 18246, this day decided by this court. The same reasoning and the same rules of law applied in No. 18246, supra, apply in the case at bar.

Upon authority of Empire Gas Fuel Co. v. Lindersmith, 131 Okla. 183, 268 P. 218, this case is affirmed.


Summaries of

Skelly Oil Co. v. Odom

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 5, 1928
131 Okla. 183 (Okla. 1928)
Case details for

Skelly Oil Co. v. Odom

Case Details

Full title:SKELLY OIL CO. et al. v. ODOM

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 5, 1928

Citations

131 Okla. 183 (Okla. 1928)
268 P. 218

Citing Cases

Thaxton v. Beneficial Mortg. Co.

¶ 18 We find that a substantial controversy exists as to whether Plaintiffs justifiably relied upon…

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. U.S. Fidel. G. Co.

It is logically axiomatic that when the trial court held that there was no promise, he did not consider the…