From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skakandy v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 3, 1949
298 N.Y. 886 (N.Y. 1949)

Summary

holding that tort actions against Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund must be brought in the Court of Claims because such Commissioners are officials and agents of the State

Summary of this case from Methodist Hosp. v. State Ins

Opinion

Argued January 12, 1949

Decided March 3, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, LAMBIASE, J.

Morris Zweibel, Robert X. Kuzmier and Francis E. Carberry for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum and Wendell P. Brown of counsel), for respondent.



Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE and FULD, JJ.


Summaries of

Skakandy v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 3, 1949
298 N.Y. 886 (N.Y. 1949)

holding that tort actions against Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund must be brought in the Court of Claims because such Commissioners are officials and agents of the State

Summary of this case from Methodist Hosp. v. State Ins
Case details for

Skakandy v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:ALICE M. SKAKANDY, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 3, 1949

Citations

298 N.Y. 886 (N.Y. 1949)
84 N.E.2d 804

Citing Cases

Juba v. General Builders Supply Corp.

In that second paragraph of section 29 there is the provision that, if the third-party action be not brought…

United States Gypsum Co. v. R-S Corp.

The defendant argues that the motion be granted upon the authority of one case, namely, Commissioners of…