Skaggs v. State

51 Citing cases

  1. Felder v. State

    831 So. 2d 562 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 6 times

    2001); Simmons v. State, 678 So.2d 683, 688 (Miss. 1996); Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897, 900 (Miss. 1996); State v. Magnusen, 646 So.2d 1275, 1278 (Miss. 1994); Noe v. State, 616 So.2d 298, 300 (Miss.

  2. Jones v. State

    1999 KA 415 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 2 times

    1990). See Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897, 900 (Miss. 1996); Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1258 (Miss. 1996). Jones did not assert the statutory right to a speedy trial provided in Miss.

  3. Blakley v. State

    791 So. 2d 326 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 1 times

    ¶ 7. An accused's constitutional right to a speedy trial attaches when the person is effectively charged with a crime. Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897, 900 (Miss. 1996); Noe v. State, 616 So.2d 298, 300 (Miss. 1993).

  4. Davis v. State

    750 So. 2d 552 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that armed robbery and aggravated assault are “two legally separate, distinct crimes” requiring proof of different elements

    ¶ 26. The Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article Three, Section Twenty-six of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890 guarantee a criminal defendant's right to a speedy trial, which attaches when the defendant is effectively accused of the crime, Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897, 900 (Miss. 1996). The constitutional right exists separate and apart from the right to a speedy trial provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 99-17-1 (Rev. 1994).

  5. Overton v. State

    195 So. 3d 715 (Miss. 2016)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding abuse of discretion to exclude defense witnesses disclosed day before trial

    2006) ; Coleman v. State, 749 So.2d 1003 (Miss.1999) ; Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897 (Miss.1996).¶ 24. The majority repeatedly cites Myers v. State, and indeed, Myers correctly states the law.

  6. Johnson v. State

    2008 CT 537 (Miss. 2011)   Cited 56 times
    Holding that a nineteen-month delay caused by crowded dockets did not warrant dismissal despite the defendant's assertion of his right to a speedy trial

    Id. at 176.Sharp, 786 So.2d at 380 (citing Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897, 900 (Miss. 1996)).Id. at 381.

  7. Williams v. State

    2008 CT 844 (Miss. 2011)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that the suspicious timing of a supplemental discovery disclosure failed to constitute a finding or showing of willfulness or motivation to gain tactical advantage

    Morris, 927 So.2d at 747.Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897, 903-04(Miss. 1996).Skaggs, 676 So.2d at 902.

  8. Coleman v. State

    97 KA 1488 (Miss. 1999)   Cited 32 times
    In Coleman, the Mississippi Supreme Court held that the trial court's exclusion of the defendant's proposed alibi witness based on a failure to comply with Rule 9.

    ¶ 9. We have previously discussed sanctions for discovery violations in Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897 (Miss. 1996) and Houston v. State, 531 So.2d 598 (Miss. 1988). These cases referenced the United States Supreme Court case of Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400, 108 S.Ct. 646, 98 L.Ed.2d 798 (1988).

  9. Watts v. State

    733 So. 2d 214 (Miss. 1999)   Cited 133 times
    Holding that a failure to make a contemporaneous objection to allegations of prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments waived the issue for appeal

    "The constitutional right to a speedy trial attaches at the time a person is effectively accused of a crime." Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897, 900 (Miss. 1996); Noe v. State, 616 So.2d 298, 300 (Miss. 1993).

  10. Coleman v. State

    725 So. 2d 154 (Miss. 1998)   Cited 6 times

    ¶ 7. The right to a speedy trial also is guaranteed by the sixth and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution and art. 3, § 26 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890. "The constitutional right to a speedy trial attaches at the time a person is effectively accused of a crime." Skaggs v. State, 676 So.2d 897, 900 (Miss. 1996); Noe v. State, 616 So.2d 298, 300 (Miss. 1993).