From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.K. Mortgage Holdings Limited v. Subirats

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-05708.

April 4, 2006.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an amended judgment of foreclosure and sale of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), entered May 10, 2005, as awarded the plaintiff the amount of any deficiency against the defendants in the event the proceeds of the foreclosure sale were insufficient to pay the amount owed to the plaintiff.

John F. Clennan, Ronkonkoma, N.Y., for appellants.

Torgan Cooper, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Mitchell K. Aaron of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in amending the judgment of foreclosure and sale in awarding the plaintiff the amount of any deficiency against the defendants in the event the proceeds of the foreclosure sale were insufficient to pay the amount owed to the plaintiff ( see Pines at Setauket v. Retirement Mgt. Group, 246 AD2d 528; Poughkeepsie Sav. Bank, FSB v. Maplewood Land Dev. Co., 210 AD2d 606; Security Pac. Mtge. Real Estate Servs., Inc. v. Herald Ctr. Ltd., 731 F Supp 605).


Summaries of

S.K. Mortgage Holdings Limited v. Subirats

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

S.K. Mortgage Holdings Limited v. Subirats

Case Details

Full title:S.K. MORTGAGE HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Respondent, v. VINCENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2521
811 N.Y.S.2d 594