From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SK Hynix Inc. v. Iancu

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 7, 2021
2019-2340 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2021)

Opinion

2019-2340

01-07-2021

SK HYNIX INC., SK HYNIX AMERICA INC., SK HYNIX MEMORY SOLUTIONS INC., Appellants v. ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by RYAN C. MORRIS, BRIAN R. NESTER, WONJOO SUH. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-00362, IPR2018-00363.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by RYAN C. MORRIS, BRIAN R. NESTER, WONJOO SUH. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 7, 2021

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

SK Hynix Inc. v. Iancu

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 7, 2021
2019-2340 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2021)
Case details for

SK Hynix Inc. v. Iancu

Case Details

Full title:SK HYNIX INC., SK HYNIX AMERICA INC., SK HYNIX MEMORY SOLUTIONS INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 7, 2021

Citations

2019-2340 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2021)