From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sizoo v. Olympus Mortg. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 8, 2011
Case No: C 11-2561 SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: C 11-2561 SBA

11-08-2011

DENISE SIZOO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. OLYMPUS MORTGAGE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REMANDING ACTION

Plaintiff Denise Sizoo, acting pro se, commenced the instant mortgage fraud action in Sonoma County Superior Court on April 26, 2011, against American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., among others. On May 26, 2011, Defendants filed a Notice of Removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) on the grounds that Plaintiff's claims arise under federal law. Although the Complaint only asserts state law causes of action, Plaintiff's sixth cause of action, styled as "Defendants Lack Standing to Proceed with Foreclosure," alleges that Defendants violated the Truth in Lending Act ("TILA") and Regulation Z. Compl. ¶ 32.

On June 2, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. 17. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition to the motion by October 11, 2011, as required by the version of Local Rule 7-3 in effect when the motion was filed. Thus, on October 27, 2011, the Court sua sponte granted Plaintiff an extension of time until November 4, 2011 to oppose the motion, and continued the motion hearing to November 15, 2011. Dkt. 23. To date, the Court has not received any response from Plaintiff.

Based on Plaintiff's failure to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss, the Court grants said motion to dismiss with respect to Plaintiff's sixth cause of action insofar as it is predicated on TILA and/or Regulation Z. See Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995) (court may grant unopposed motion to dismiss under Rule 41(b)). The Court declines to assert supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining claims, all of which are based on state law. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc., 625 F.3d 550, 561 (9th Cir. 2010) ("A district court 'may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction" if it "has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction.'") (quoting in part 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3)). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as unopposed with respect to Plaintiff's sixth cause of action insofar as it is predicated upon violations of TILA and/or Regulation Z. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.

2. The Court declines to assert supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining claims and REMANDS the action to Sonoma County Superior Court.

3. The hearing date of November 15, 2011 is VACATED.

4. The Clerk shall close the file and terminate any pending matters. IT IS SO ORDERED.

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

DENISE SIZOO, Plaintiff,

v.

OLYMPUS MORTGAGE COMPANY et al, Defendant.

Case Number: CV11-02561 SBA


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.

That on November 8, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Denise Sizoo

4733 Stonehedge Drive

Santa Rosa, CA 95405

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Sizoo v. Olympus Mortg. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 8, 2011
Case No: C 11-2561 SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Sizoo v. Olympus Mortg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DENISE SIZOO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. OLYMPUS MORTGAGE COMPANY, a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 8, 2011

Citations

Case No: C 11-2561 SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)