From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sixty-01 Ass'n of Apartment Owners v. Pub. Serv. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 8, 2023
2:22-CV-01373 JCC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-CV-01373 JCC

12-08-2023

SIXTY-01 ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS, a Washington non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. PUBLIC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY; GREAT LAKES INSURANCE, SE; ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION; ALTERRA EXCESS & SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY; INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY; STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY; HOMELAND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK; CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON (BRIT SYNDICATE 2987); and ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.

Ashbaugh Beal Jesse D. Miller, Zachary O. McIsaac, Attorneys for Plaintiff McCormick Barstow, LLP Patrick Fredette, Kevin D. Hansen, pro hac vice Maria E. Valencia, pro hac vice Nicholas H. Rasmussen, pro hac vice Attorneys for Defendant Public Service Insurance Company Jeffrey S. Tindal Daniel C. Heath Selman Leichenger Edson Hsu Newman & Moore LLP Attorneys for Great Lakes Insurance, SE Stephania C. Denton Brian T. Kiolbasa Lane Powell PC Attorneys for Indian Harbor Insurance Company Timothy J. Repass Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP Attorneys for Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Brit Syndicate 2987) Matthew J. Sekits Owen R. Mooney Mathews Bullivant Houser Bailey PC Attorneys for Homeland Insurance Company of New York Marilee C. Erickson Reed McClure and P. Bruce Converse Dickinson Wright PLLC Attorneys for Alterra Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Company (Evanston Insurance Company) Michael E. Ricketts Gordon Thomas Honeywell LLP and Gary A. Barrera Jonathan Gross Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP Attorneys for Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company Gregory S. Worden Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP Attorneys for Aspen Specialty Insurance Company Robert A. Meyers Selman Leichenger Edson Hsu Newman Moore LLP Attorneys for Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company and Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation Robert S. May Dylan T. Becker Kilmer, Voorhees & Laurick, P.C. Attorneys for Arch Specialty Insurance Company


Ashbaugh Beal Jesse D. Miller, Zachary O. McIsaac, Attorneys for Plaintiff

McCormick Barstow, LLP Patrick Fredette, Kevin D. Hansen, pro hac vice Maria E. Valencia, pro hac vice Nicholas H. Rasmussen, pro hac vice Attorneys for Defendant Public Service Insurance Company

Jeffrey S. Tindal Daniel C. Heath Selman Leichenger Edson Hsu Newman & Moore LLP Attorneys for Great Lakes Insurance, SE

Stephania C. Denton Brian T. Kiolbasa Lane Powell PC Attorneys for Indian Harbor Insurance Company

Timothy J. Repass Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP Attorneys for Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Brit Syndicate 2987)

Matthew J. Sekits Owen R. Mooney Mathews Bullivant Houser Bailey PC Attorneys for Homeland Insurance Company of New York

Marilee C. Erickson Reed McClure and P. Bruce Converse Dickinson Wright PLLC Attorneys for Alterra Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Company (Evanston Insurance Company)

Michael E. Ricketts Gordon Thomas Honeywell LLP and Gary A. Barrera Jonathan Gross Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP Attorneys for Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company

Gregory S. Worden Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP Attorneys for Aspen Specialty Insurance Company

Robert A. Meyers Selman Leichenger Edson Hsu Newman Moore LLP Attorneys for Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company and Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation

Robert S. May Dylan T. Becker Kilmer, Voorhees & Laurick, P.C. Attorneys for Arch Specialty Insurance Company

STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND RELATED DEADLINES

John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge

I. Stipulation

The Association and defendant Public Service Insurance Company (“PSIC”)have conferred regarding the deadlines set forth in the Court's Civil Trial Scheduling Order (Dkt. # 94). In light of the trial in this case currently being stayed (Dkt. # 155), and the currently unresolved discovery issues associated with PSIC's documents (Dkt. # 154), the parties are in agreement that it makes sense to extend the current discovery cutoff and discovery-related deadlines. Specifically, the parties request a 120-day extension of the current discovery cutoff, such that the amended deadlines would be as follows:

Pursuant to the Notice of Partial Settlement recently filed with the Court (Dkt. # 165), PSIC is the only remaining defendant with active claims against it.

Date

Event

March 15, 2024

Last day to disclose expert witnesses

April 5, 2024

Last day to submit expert disclosure rebuttals

April 24, 2024

Deadline to file discovery-related motions

April 24, 2024

Discovery cutoff

II. Order

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.


Summaries of

Sixty-01 Ass'n of Apartment Owners v. Pub. Serv. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 8, 2023
2:22-CV-01373 JCC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Sixty-01 Ass'n of Apartment Owners v. Pub. Serv. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SIXTY-01 ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS, a Washington non-profit…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 8, 2023

Citations

2:22-CV-01373 JCC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 8, 2023)