From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sitton v. Lombardo

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 30, 2022
2:17-cv-00111-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 30, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-cv-00111-JCM-VCF

12-30-2022

WILL SITTON, Plaintiffs, v. LVMPD SHERIFF LOMBARDO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Corrections Officers Andrew Saavedra, Marquis Hines, Manuel Gardea, and Theodoros Snowden's request for exemption of attendance requirement at the settlement conference scheduled for January 6, 2023. ECF NO. 314.

No opposition has been filed and the time to file an opposition has passed.

Under LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. Here, it seems as though plaintiff has consented to the granting of the instant motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Corrections Officers Andrew Saavedra, Marquis Hines, Manuel Gardea, and Theodoros Snowden's request for exemption of attendance requirement at the settlement conference scheduled for January 6, 2023 (ECF NO. 314), is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Sitton v. Lombardo

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 30, 2022
2:17-cv-00111-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Sitton v. Lombardo

Case Details

Full title:WILL SITTON, Plaintiffs, v. LVMPD SHERIFF LOMBARDO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 30, 2022

Citations

2:17-cv-00111-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 30, 2022)