From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sittler v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Feb 18, 2011
CASE NO. C11-5137 JRC (W.D. Wash. Feb. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. C11-5137 JRC.

February 18, 2011


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable plaintiff to properly serve copies of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is his responsibility to properly serve copies of the complaint along with an appropriate summons as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 18th day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

Sittler v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Feb 18, 2011
CASE NO. C11-5137 JRC (W.D. Wash. Feb. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Sittler v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS J. SITTLER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Feb 18, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. C11-5137 JRC (W.D. Wash. Feb. 18, 2011)