SITO Mobile R&D IP, LLC v. Hulu, LLC

Full title: SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD., Appellants v. HULU, LLC…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 5, 2024

No. 2022-2120 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2024)

Opinion

2022-2120

04-05-2024

SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD., Appellants v. HULU, LLC, Appellee

MINGHUI YANG, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA. BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny &Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN; NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San Francisco, CA.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2020-00028.

MINGHUI YANG, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA.

BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny &Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN;

NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San Francisco, CA.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED.

PER CURIAM

DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.