Opinion
No. 12-6496
08-16-2012
Richard Sisson, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Davies Supino, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00313-LMB-TCB) Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Sisson, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Davies Supino, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Richard Sisson appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sisson v. Davis, No. 1:11-cv-00313-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 2 & Mar. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED