From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sissingh v. Bernhardt

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1899
25 Misc. 785 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)

Opinion

January, 1899.

Martin Paskusz, for appellants.

Louis Levy, for respondent.


Counsel on both sides in their briefs, which have been submitted to the court, refer to the proceedings in the attachment suit and to the transfer to the plaintiff of the cause of action arising under the bond as being in evidence. The record, however, utterly fails to show that any such proof was offered or received, nor have any exhibits in that regard been transmitted to us.

The record must, therefore, be sent back to the trial justice for a further return, and the case restored to the general calendar for argument.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GILDERSLEEVE and GIEGERICH, JJ.

Record sent back to trial justice for further return, and case restored to general calendar for argument.


Summaries of

Sissingh v. Bernhardt

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1899
25 Misc. 785 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)
Case details for

Sissingh v. Bernhardt

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT SISSINGH, Respondent, v . RIKA BERNHARDT et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1899

Citations

25 Misc. 785 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)