Sissell v. Nagel

Full title: Chad W. Sissell Plaintiff and Appellant v. Thomas Nagel, Defendant and…

Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Jan 19, 2000

609 N.W.2d 455 (N.D. 2000)

2000 N.D. 4

Opinion

Nos. 990269, 990270.

Decided January 19, 2000.

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable JAMES M. BEKKEN, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Loren C. McCray, for plaintiff and appellant.

Daniel L. Hovland (argued) and Scott K. Porsborg, Smith Bakke Hovland Oppegard, for defendants and appellees.

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Chad W. Sissell appealed from an Order Denying a Motion to Vacate an Order of Dismissal. Sissell sued the City of Jamestown and Thomas Nagel, alleging excessive force, false arrest, harassment and terrorism. Sissell argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDEWALLE, C.J.

CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, DALE V. SANDSTROM.