From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SISK v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 18, 1930
127 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

8 Div. 928.

March 18, 1930.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

O. M. Rains, of Scottsboro, for appellant.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.


From a judgment of conviction for the offense of carrying a concealed pistol about his person, this appeal was taken.

Upon the trial, a question of fact only was involved. In our opinion the evidence adduced was ample to justify the jury in returning the verdict of guilty.

No question of law of sufficient import to require the consideration of this court appears to be involved.

The record is regular, and, as the trial proceeded throughout without prejudicial error, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

SISK v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 18, 1930
127 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

SISK v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:Hub SISK v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 18, 1930

Citations

127 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)
127 So. 926