From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sirrine v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 12, 2009
Civil No. 07-1288-TC (D. Or. May. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-1288-TC.

May 12, 2009


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on March 17, 2009. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. The Commissioner's decision is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).


Summaries of

Sirrine v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 12, 2009
Civil No. 07-1288-TC (D. Or. May. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Sirrine v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:GLEN A. SIRRINE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: May 12, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 07-1288-TC (D. Or. May. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Moriel v. Berryhill

In fact, a notation that a plaintiff is "generally doing well," by itself, does not contradict a treating…

Long v. Berryhill

(AR 34). Dr. Devaraj's notation that Plaintiff was "generally doing well," by itself, did not contradict his…