From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sirota v. Shacknovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1925
212 App. Div. 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

February, 1925.


Upon reargument, judgment reversed on the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon authority of Happel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. ( 210 App. Div. 461) and O'Connor v. Webber ( 239 N.Y. 191). Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur, Kelby, J., dissents on the ground that the situation presented in the case at bar is different from the Happel case.


Summaries of

Sirota v. Shacknovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1925
212 App. Div. 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Sirota v. Shacknovitz

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES SIROTA, Respondent, v. JOSEPH SHACKNOVITZ and Others, Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1925

Citations

212 App. Div. 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)