holding that prosecutor's comment that regarding "uncontradicted," "undenied," "unrebutted," or "undisputed" evidence is considered violative of Fifth Amendment rights if only person who could have contradicted, denied, rebutted or disputed the evidence was the defendant himself
Summary of this case from State v. KeeseckerNo. 96-5954.
October 15, 1996, October TERM, 1996.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 87 F. 3d 34.
holding that prosecutor's comment that regarding "uncontradicted," "undenied," "unrebutted," or "undisputed" evidence is considered violative of Fifth Amendment rights if only person who could have contradicted, denied, rebutted or disputed the evidence was the defendant himself
Summary of this case from State v. KeeseckerFull title:SIROIS v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 15, 1996
She recognizes, as well, that the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals unanimously have adopted the test.…
Young v. NickelsFoster v. Tillery, 996 F. Supp. 1316 (Kan. 1998); Jefferson v. Hart, No. 91-3232-RDR, 1993 WL 302137 at *4…