From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sirohi v. Merges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1977
58 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

June 27, 1977


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondent to restore petitioner to the position of principal psychologist, from which position petitioner had been "demoted", the appeal, as limited by petitioner's brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 27, 1976, as, upon reargument, dismissed the petition on the merits. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner was permanently appointed to the position of associate psychologist (grade 23) in March, 1970. Thereafter, he was promoted, by way of a provisional appointment, to the position of principal psychologist (grade 27). In December, 1975 he was summarily removed from the latter position and reinstated to his permanent position, from which he was technically on leave of absence for the period of his provisional service (see 4 NYCRR 4.10). This CPLR article 78 proceeding was then commenced to "annul" his removal and "demotion". Petitioner's reliance upon section 75 Civ. Serv. of the Civil Service Law is misplaced. That statute prohibits, inter alia, the removal of a person holding a position by permanent appointment in the competitive class, except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges. However, petitioner was not removed from a position he held by permanent appointment. Rather, he was merely removed from the higher grade position which he held by a provisional appointment. The latter situation is governed by section 65 Civ. Serv. of the Civil Service Law, not section 75, and a provisional appointee may, of course, be discharged from such a position without a hearing or cause shown (see Matter of Greene v New York City Housing Auth., 192 Misc. 293; Matter of Pedrick v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 24 Misc.2d 1066; see, also, Matter of Villani v County of Nassau, 36 Misc.2d 766). We find petitioner's remaining arguments for reversal to be without merit. Hopkins, J.P., Shapiro, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sirohi v. Merges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1977
58 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Sirohi v. Merges

Case Details

Full title:NARENDRA S. SIROHI, Appellant, v. RICHARD C. MERGES, as Director of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1977

Citations

58 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Town Bd. of Town of New Windsor

Any member of such police department at the time of the hearing or trial of such charges shall have the right…

Matter of Rivera v. Beekman

Thus, it is well settled that, absent some statute, rule or contract, a nontenured public employee does not…