holding that eyewitness' account of individual shoplifting was sufficient to uphold conviction
Summary of this case from Roberts v. MurrayNo. 359, 2007.
April 21, 2008.
Appeal from the Superior Cr 0510022387.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
holding that eyewitness' account of individual shoplifting was sufficient to uphold conviction
Summary of this case from Roberts v. MurrayFull title:Sirmans v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Apr 21, 2008
Therefore, the Court finds that Staples and its employees are immune from suit under 11 Del. C. § 840(d). See…