From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siqueiros v. Clark

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 29, 2011
No. C 08-2939 MMC (PR), (Docket No. 20) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 08-2939 MMC (PR), (Docket No. 20)

November 29, 2011.


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING


On June 12, 2008, petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 18, 2011, the Court granted petitioner leave to file supplemental briefing and exhibits in support of petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Petitioner now seeks an extension of time to file such briefing and exhibits.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, petitioner's request for an extension of time is hereby GRANTED. Petitioner shall file his supplemental briefing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim, such briefing not to exceed fifteen pages in length, and any additional exhibits in support thereof, no later than December 19, 2011. Respondent shall file a supplemental answer, not to exceed fifteen pages in length, within thirty days of the filing of petitioner's supplemental briefing. If petitioner wishes to file a supplemental traverse, he shall do so with fifteen days of the filing of respondent's supplemental answer; any such traverse is not to exceed ten pages in length.

This order terminates Docket No. 20.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Siqueiros v. Clark

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 29, 2011
No. C 08-2939 MMC (PR), (Docket No. 20) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Siqueiros v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:SIQUEIROS v. CLARK

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

No. C 08-2939 MMC (PR), (Docket No. 20) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)