From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siotos v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 10, 2022
21-cv-02544-SK (N.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-02544-SK

06-10-2022

PHILIP SIOTOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant.


CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

Regarding Docket No. 38

SALLIE KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties advise the Court that they have reached a settlement of this case and expect to file a dismissal with prejudice prior to July 18, 2022. (Dkt. No. 38.) All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Dkt. Nos. 6, 7.) Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, no later than July 18, 2022, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Siotos v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 10, 2022
21-cv-02544-SK (N.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Siotos v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP SIOTOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 10, 2022

Citations

21-cv-02544-SK (N.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)