From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sintercast Corp. v. Everglow Lighting Fixture

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1953
282 App. Div. 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

December 7, 1953.


In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property and for other relief, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order as denied its motion (1) for summary judgment; (2) to strike out defendant's counterclaim for insufficiency; (3) to require defendant to make the counterclaim more definite and certain, and (4) to require defendant separately to state and number causes of action contained in the counterclaim. Defendant appeals from so much of the order as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for severance of the action as to the counterclaim. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sintercast Corp. v. Everglow Lighting Fixture

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1953
282 App. Div. 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Sintercast Corp. v. Everglow Lighting Fixture

Case Details

Full title:SINTERCAST CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC., Appellant-Respondent, v. EVERGLOW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)