From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinnott v. Ennis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1907
120 App. Div. 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

June, 1907.

Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Lambert, JJ.


We think the court acquired jurisdiction, that the facts alleged in the affidavit were sufficient to justify a finding that the defendant could not with due diligence be found within this State, and that the sale under the judgment was, therefore, valid. It follows that judgment must be directed for the plaintiff, but, under the stipulation, without costs.


Judgment for plaintiff, without costs. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Sinnott v. Ennis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1907
120 App. Div. 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

Sinnott v. Ennis

Case Details

Full title:FRANK J. SINNOTT, Plaintiff, v . JOSEPH L. ENNIS, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1907

Citations

120 App. Div. 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)