Opinion
973, 974
April 29, 2003.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about March 22, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff's decedent and for loss of consortium sustained by plaintiff, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants' cross motions pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the action, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered June 26, 2002, which granted plaintiff's motion to reargue, and, upon reargument, adhered to the prior order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.
Irving Gertel, for plaintiff-appellant.
Norman Corenthal, Robert M. Ortiz Harold A. Campbell, for defendants-respondents.
Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach, JJ.
In disobedience of a series of court orders, the elderly decedent did not appear for examination before trial and his attorney, who continues to represent his estate, did not comply with court directions to commence a guardianship proceeding. The result of this repeated disobedience was that the decedent died before defendants had an opportunity to examine him. Absent a reasonable excuse for the disobedience, dismissal of the action was a proper exercise of discretion (see Oberlander v. Levi, 207 A.D.2d 437; Pimental v. City of New York, 246 A.D.2d 467, 468). We have considered and rejected plaintiff's other arguments.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.