From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SingularDTV GmbH v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 18, 2022
1:21-cv-06000 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-06000 (VEC)

03-18-2022

SINGULARDTV, GMBH, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.

Benjamin J. A. Sauter Christopher S. Cogburn Alexa R. Perlman KOBRE & KIM LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff SingularDTV GmbH


Benjamin J. A. Sauter

Christopher S. Cogburn

Alexa R. Perlman

KOBRE & KIM LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff SingularDTV GmbH

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SINGULARDTV GMBH'S MOTION TO INTERVENE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

HON. VALERIE CAPRONI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that SingularDTV GmbH, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby withdraws its Motion (Dkt. No. 11) for an order granting leave to intervene as of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a), or, in the alternative, to substitute counsel under Local Civil Rule 1.4.

In withdrawing its Motion, SingularDTV GmbH does not consent to Morrison-Tenenbaum PLLC's purported representation of it in this action. SingularDTV GmbH expressly reserves and does not waive its rights in this regard.

Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the open motions at Dockets 11 and 35.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

SingularDTV GmbH v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 18, 2022
1:21-cv-06000 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2022)
Case details for

SingularDTV GmbH v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:SINGULARDTV, GMBH, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-06000 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2022)