Opinion
Nos. 05-05-00685-CR, 05-05-00686-CR
Opinion Filed June 22, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F01-15023-Rq and F01-40041-Q. Affirmed.
Before Justices FITZGERALD, FRANCIS, and LANG-MIERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
As part of a plea bargain agreement, James Joseph Singleton pleaded guilty to two felony charges of burglary of a habitation, and the trial court assessed punishment at ten years in prison, probated for ten years, and a $1500 fine. Less than two years later, appellant was indicted for capital murder, and the State filed a motion to revoke appellant's probation. After a jury convicted appellant of capital murder, the trial court revoked his probation and assessed punishment at ten years in prison and a $1500 fine. Appellant filed notices of appeal of the trial court's judgments revoking his probation. Appellant's attorney filed briefs in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The briefs present a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the briefs to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's briefs. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.