Opinion
No. 12-02-00063-CR
Opinion delivered May 30, 2003 Do Not Publish
Appeal From The 123rd Judicial District Court Of Shelby County, Texas
Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., and GRIFFITH, J.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Michael Shawn Singleton pleaded guilty to the first degree felony offense of Aggravated Robbery. The trial court assessed his punishment at eight years deferred adjudication community supervision and a $2,000.00 fine. That same year, the State filed a motion urging the court to proceed to final adjudication. After a hearing, the trial court found the allegations contained in the State's motion to be "true," and found Appellant guilty of Aggravated Robbery. The trial court assessed Appellant's punishment at thirty years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. Appellant subsequently filed a notice of appeal. We affirm. Appellant's counsel, in compliance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969), states that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and is of the opinion that the record reflects no reversible error and there is no error upon which an appeal can be predicated. He further relates that he is well acquainted with the facts in this case. In compliance with Anders , Gainous , and High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), Appellant's brief presents a chronological summation of the procedural history of the case, and further states that Appellant's counsel is unable to present any arguable points of error. We have likewise reviewed the record for reversible error and have found none. As required by Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991), Appellant's counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. We carried the motion for consideration with the merits of the appeal. Having done so and finding no reversible error, Appellant's counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is hereby granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed .
Counsel for Appellant provided Appellant with a copy of his brief and Appellant was given time to file his own brief in this cause. The time for filing such a brief has expired and we have received no pro se brief.