From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singleton v. Harry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 13, 2016
Civ. No. 1:13-cv-2711 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 13, 2016)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1:13-cv-2711

09-13-2016

TYRONE SINGLETON, Plaintiff, v. LAUREL HARRY, et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Schwab

MEMORANDUM

Before the court is a report and recommendation (Doc. 24) filed by the magistrate judge in which she recommends that Defendants' motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. She recommends that Plaintiff Tyrone Singleton's claim of a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights by being placed in solitary confinement be dismissed and that his claim of being confined without a parole revocation hearing not be dismissed.

On August 9, 2016, Defendants filed a motion to supplement the record. (Doc. 26.) By order of August 18, 2016 (Doc. 27), the magistrate judge denied the motion without prejudice to Defendants filing a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Middle District Local Rule 56.1.

In her report and recommendation, the magistrate judge found that the length of administrative confinement did not violate Singleton's due process rights and that he did not allege facts from which it could reasonably be inferred that he was subjected to atypical and significant hardships in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life such that he had a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause. (Doc. 24, p. 23.) Her recommendation that the motion to dismiss Singleton's claim of being confined without a parole revocation hearing not be granted was due to an incomplete record on this issue.

Based on this court's review of the record and the case law applicable to the issues, the report and recommendation will be adopted.

s/Sylvia H. Rambo

SYLVIA H. RAMBO

United States District Judge Dated: September 13, 2016


Summaries of

Singleton v. Harry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 13, 2016
Civ. No. 1:13-cv-2711 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Singleton v. Harry

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE SINGLETON, Plaintiff, v. LAUREL HARRY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 13, 2016

Citations

Civ. No. 1:13-cv-2711 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 13, 2016)

Citing Cases

Singleton v. Harry

Simply put, the time-served sentence imposed upon Singleton means that for some period of time that he was…