From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singleton v. Georgia Pacific Corporation

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 16, 1984
315 S.E.2d 876 (Ga. 1984)

Opinion

40509.

DECIDED MAY 16, 1984.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 168 Ga. App. 553 ( 310 S.E.2d 1).

Edward E. Boshears, for appellant.

Richard M. Scarlett, M. Lynn Frey III, for appellee.

J. S. Hutto, Alton D. Kitchings, Gene Mac Winburn, Billy E. Moore, Dan F. Sullivan, Thomas W. Malone, Michael J. Rust, George C. Grant, Williston C. White, Harvey S. Gray, amici curiae.


James Singleton was employed by BAMM, Inc., which was in turn under contract to repair the roof of a Georgia Pacific building in Brunswick. In March 1982, Singleton was injured while working on Georgia Pacific's roof for BAMM, Inc. He made a claim for, and received, workers' compensation benefits from BAMM as a result of this injury. Singleton thereupon sued Georgia Pacific in tort, but the trial court entered an order granting summary judgment in favor of Georgia Pacific on the ground that it was Singleton's statutory employer under the Workers' Compensation Act and entitled to immunity from tort liability, citing Godbee v. Western Electric Co., 161 Ga. App. 731 ( 288 S.E.2d 881) (1982). The Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court's decision and affirmed. We granted certiorari and now reverse.

Our decision in this case is constrained by recent opinions from this Court and the Court of Appeals. In Modlin v. Black Decker, Court of Appeals case no. 67781 (decided March 5, 1984), Godbee and its progeny were overruled on the ground at issue here. We examined Modlin and its effect on Godbee with approval in Manning v. Ga. Power Co., 252 Ga. 404 ( 314 S.E.2d 432) (1984). We conclude that the present case is controlled by Manning . Georgia pacific is an owner, not a contractor, and as such is not liable for workers' compensation benefits. Thus Georgia pacific was not the statutory employer of Singleton for purposes of the Workers' Compensation Act and is not immune from tort liability pursuant to OCGA § 34-9-11 (Code Ann. § 114-103).

Judgment reversed. All the justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., who dissents.


DECIDED MAY 16, 1984.


Summaries of

Singleton v. Georgia Pacific Corporation

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 16, 1984
315 S.E.2d 876 (Ga. 1984)
Case details for

Singleton v. Georgia Pacific Corporation

Case Details

Full title:SINGLETON v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 16, 1984

Citations

315 S.E.2d 876 (Ga. 1984)
315 S.E.2d 876

Citing Cases

Singleton v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation

BANKE, Presiding Judge. The decision of this court in Singleton v. Ga.-Pacific Corp., 168 Ga. App. 553 ( 310…

Fennell v. Max Rittenbaum, Inc.

2. Appellants primarily assert that the trial court erred as appellee was not a statutory employee under the…