From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singleton v. Cooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SECTION "I"(4)
May 4, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3188 (E.D. La. May. 4, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3188

05-04-2012

YUL SINGLETON v. LYNN COOPER


ORDER

The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and having considered the petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Yul Singleton's Objections (Rec. Doc. No. 31) are OVERRULED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Singleton's request to dismiss and abandon his unexhausted ineffective assistance of counsel claims is GRANTED and that his unexhausted ineffective assistance of counsel claims are voluntarily DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: (1) counsel failed to investigate the basis for Norman's testimony or expose the plea deal between the State and Norman; (2) counsel allowed Singleton to be wrongfully convicted; (3) counsel failed to professionally perform his duty to represent Singleton; (4) his failure to investigate and perform caused a meaningless appeal; (5) counsel failed to timely file pretrial motions for discovery and impeachment material related to Roussell and Norman and counsel failed to timely file for production of the initial police report; (6) counsel failed to adequately investigate by obtaining Norman's pretrial statement and the police report; and (7) counsel failed to file a pretrial motion to suppress Norman's perjured statements.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Singleton's § 2254 claims asserting that counsel was ineffective for failure to file a motion to reconsider the sentence, that the State withheld exculpatory Brady and impeachment evidence, and that the State knowingly used the perjured testimony be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as procedurally barred.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 4th day of M a y, 2012.

_________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Singleton v. Cooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SECTION "I"(4)
May 4, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3188 (E.D. La. May. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Singleton v. Cooper

Case Details

Full title:YUL SINGLETON v. LYNN COOPER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SECTION "I"(4)

Date published: May 4, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3188 (E.D. La. May. 4, 2012)

Citing Cases

Warfield v. Warden, La. State Penitentiary

A federal court may not second-guess a state court's rule of procedure, but it need not honor the procedural…