From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singletary v. Sentry Group

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jan 24, 2011
10-CV-6627 CJS (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2011)

Opinion

10-CV-6627 CJS.

January 24, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a motion to appoint counsel in this action (Docket No. 4). Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied at this time because there is insufficient information before the Court to make the assessment of plaintiff's claims under the standards required by Hendricks v. Coughlin, 114 F.3d 390, 392 (2d Cir. 1997), and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986), as issue has yet to be joined. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel may be renewed after the defendant has answered the complaint.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 19, 2011

Rochester, New York


Summaries of

Singletary v. Sentry Group

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jan 24, 2011
10-CV-6627 CJS (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Singletary v. Sentry Group

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT SINGLETARY, Plaintiff, v. SENTRY GROUP (SAFE), Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Jan 24, 2011

Citations

10-CV-6627 CJS (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2011)