From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singletary v. Gene Estes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 1, 1966
187 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 34998.

June 1, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for petitioner.

Lally, Miller Hodges, H. Jack Miller, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 18, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney's fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Singletary v. Gene Estes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 1, 1966
187 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Singletary v. Gene Estes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE SINGLETARY, PETITIONER, v. GENE ESTES, INC., FIDELITY CASUALTY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 1, 1966

Citations

187 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1966)