From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singletary v. Duggins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 13, 1999
724 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-2977

January 13, 1999.

Gary Grant, Assistant General Counsel (Tallahassee), for petitioner.

Lancy Duggins, in proper person.

Before COPE, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.


Harry K. Singletary, Secretary of the Department of Corrections [DOC], seeks a writ of certiorari, directed to the trial court, quashing that court's order entered in DOC inmate Lancy Duggins' criminal case, which order prohibits the DOC from cutting Duggins' hair (based on Duggins' religious beliefs). We grant the writ and quash the trial court's order as the DOC was not given notice of the proceedings through which the order was entered. See Florida Dep't of Corrections v. Wilson, 594 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). We also observe that even if notice had been given, the trial court lacks authority in this criminal action to regulate the treatment of a sentenced defendant in the prison system. Singletary v. Acosta, 659 So.2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Duggins states that he desires to challenge the validity of the DOC's hair regulation. Our decision is without prejudice to Duggins' seeking such relief in an appropriate forum.

Writ granted; order quashed.


Summaries of

Singletary v. Duggins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 13, 1999
724 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Singletary v. Duggins

Case Details

Full title:Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Secretary of the Florida Department of…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 13, 1999

Citations

724 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

State v. White

We further observe that entry of the lower court's order was also erroneous as the DOC was not given notice…

State v. Kendrick

The Commission filed the instant petition for writ of certiorari challenging the order. The Commission argues…