Opinion
No. 17-1569
04-23-2018
JOHN G. SINGLETARY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON; MAYOR KEITH SUMMEY; CHIEF EDDIE DRIGGERS; ANGELA CARTRETTE, North Charleston Clerk of Court Administrator, Defendants - Appellees, and NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER JONATHAN GLENN; CHANNEL 5 NEWS; RAYCOM MEDIA: BRENDA RINDGE; POST & COURIER: THE EVENING POST INDUSTRIES; CEDRUS DAVIS & FLOYD; CHICORA GARDENS LLC, all jointly & severally; ERIC MCCLURE; HARVE JACOBS; NORTH CHARLESTON LEGAL DEPARTMENT, Law Offices of Brady Hair; BURGESS, on 70055FB case history report case #201003762; LINDA, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; LB, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; EDWARDSS, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; BEHRENL, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; QUICKR, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; OFFICER CINDY BARDALLO; OFFICER GLENN WILLE, appearing on original Ticket 70055FB; UNNAMED JUVENILE COMPLAINANT, on 70055FB Incident Media Report case #2010003762; MICHAEL ZOLTANSKI; WCSC STATION MANAGER; PETER MANIGAULT; CHARLESTON COUNTY ELECTION BOARD; CEDRUS LLC; ART TITUS; DEB WILLIANS; DAVIS & FLOYD; EMMITT DAVIS, JR.; CHICORA GARDENS HOLDING LLC; CHANNEL 5 NEWS, WCSC; NORTH CHARLESTON ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT; GUTHRIS, on 70055FB case history report case # 2010003762; WILLIAM SHARPE, Defendants.
Mark W. Hardee, THE HARDEE LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Robin Lilley Jackson, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-04463-MBS) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark W. Hardee, THE HARDEE LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Robin Lilley Jackson, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
John G. Singletary, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singletary v. The City of N. Charleston, No. 2:15-cv-04463-MBS (D.S.C. June 21, 2016 & Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED