Opinion
1:20-cv-4456 (MKV)
06-15-2020
ORDER
:
The Court has carefully reviewed the ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order and petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner on Friday, June 12, 2020 [ECF #5, 6, 7-16]. The Court finds that Petition provides no justification for moving ex parte. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by 5:00 PM on Wednesday, June 17, 2020, Petitioner shall serve the petition for habeas corpus, the motion for a temporary restraining order, and a copy of this Order on Respondents.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by the same deadline, Petitioner shall file and serve a brief statement, not to exceed two pages, explaining where Petitioner is currently being detained, with as much specificity as possible, and why jurisdiction lies in this district. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (explaining that jurisdiction over a petition for habeas corpus lies in "the district of confinement"); Cesar v. Shanahan, No. 17-cv-7974, 2018 WL 1747989, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2018); Alberto v. Decker, No. 17-cv-2604, 2017 WL 6210785, at *1-*2 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2017); Phrance v. Johnson, No. 14-cv-3569, 2014 WL 6807590, at *1-*2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2014); Medina-Valdez v. Holder, No. 12-cv-6002, 2012 WL 4714758, at *1-2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2012); Guo v. Napolitano, No. 09-cv-3023, 2009 WL 2840400, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 2, 2009).
SO ORDERED.
Date: June 15, 2020
New York, NY
/s/ _________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
United States District Judge