From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
No. C 12-6566 SI (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-6566 SI

05-10-2013

JAMES SINGH, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S

MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF

ATTORNEYS' FEES

On May 7, 2013, defendant filed a motion for an award of attorneys' fees. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument. In support of the motion, defendant attached redacted documents without obtaining prior approval from the Court to file these documents under seal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); Civil L. R. 79-5. It is the Court, not defendant Wells Fargo, which decides whether documents should be sealed from the public. Civil L. R. 79-5(a); see also Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). In this Court, documents may be filed under seal only upon the granting of an administrative motion to seal as set forth in Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5. Defendant's motion does not comply with these rules. Therefore, the Court will not consider it. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Failure to follow a district court's local rules is a proper ground for dismissal.").

Accordingly, the Court DENIES defendant's motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Singh v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
No. C 12-6566 SI (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Singh v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SINGH, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-6566 SI (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)