From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 7, 2022
2:22-CV-1411-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-1411-KJM-DMC-P

11-07-2022

PARDEEP SINGH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Respondent's motion, ECF No. 13, to file a late response. Good cause appearing therefor based on counsel's declaration indicating excusable neglect due to a calendaring error, Respondent's motion is granted. Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 15, filed on October 26, 2022, is deemed timely. Petitioner's opposition to Respondent's motion is due within 30 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Singh v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 7, 2022
2:22-CV-1411-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Singh v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:PARDEEP SINGH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-1411-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)