From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. U.S. Postal Serv.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2017
2016-2668 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2668

05-09-2017

PREET M. SINGH, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent

CASSADY TOLES, Kern, Noda, Devine & Segal, San Francisco, CA, argued for petitioner. MARK E. PORADA, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD; MORGAN E. REHRIG, Office of General Counsel, United States Postal Service, Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-0752-15-0629-I-1.

JUDGMENT

CASSADY TOLES, Kern, Noda, Devine & Segal, San Francisco, CA, argued for petitioner. MARK E. PORADA, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD; MORGAN E. REHRIG, Office of General Counsel, United States Postal Service, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, REYNA and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 9, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Singh v. U.S. Postal Serv.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2017
2016-2668 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Singh v. U.S. Postal Serv.

Case Details

Full title:PREET M. SINGH, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 9, 2017

Citations

2016-2668 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2017)