From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 14, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2924 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2924 GGH P.

December 14, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

DATED: December 13, 2010


Summaries of

Singh v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 14, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2924 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Singh v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:HARMEET SINGH, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 14, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2924 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2010)