From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 5, 2007
No. 2:06-cv-2442-MCE-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-2442-MCE-DAD-P.

April 5, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 21, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 21, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Singh v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 5, 2007
No. 2:06-cv-2442-MCE-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Singh v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:HARMEET SINGH, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 5, 2007

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-2442-MCE-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2007)