From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Roark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2012
No. 11-cv-F-1623 GSA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-cv-F-1623 GSA

01-27-2012

PHUPINDER SINGH, et al. Plaintiffs, v. David Roark, Director, USCIS Texas Service Center, et al. Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the Defendants Anna Louise Benvenue Attorney for the Plaintiffs


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME

This is an immigration case in which plaintiffs challenge the delay in the adjudication of their applications for adjustment of status to that of lawful permanent resident by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The parties have previously stipulated to one extension of time as they endeavor to reach a resolution to the matter at the administrative level. As of the time of this filing, the parties continue to work toward such a resolution. Accordingly, the parties stipulate to a second extension of time, until March 30, 2012, for the government to file its answer to the complaint. As well the parties request that the status conference, currently set for February 15, 2012, be reset until sometime after the new answer date.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: _________________

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: _________________

Anna Louise Benvenue

Attorney for the Plaintiffs

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government's time to file an answer to the complaint is extended to March 30, 2012. The initial scheduling conference previously set for February 15, 2012 is continued until April 25, 2012 at 10:00 am. The parties Joint Scheduling Report is due seven days prior to the conference date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Singh v. Roark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2012
No. 11-cv-F-1623 GSA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Singh v. Roark

Case Details

Full title:PHUPINDER SINGH, et al. Plaintiffs, v. David Roark, Director, USCIS Texas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 27, 2012

Citations

No. 11-cv-F-1623 GSA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)