From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Pheiffer

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
22-cv-02393-JSW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-02393-JSW

11-02-2022

MICHAEL MANJEET SINGH, Plaintiff, v. PHEIFFER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT; REOPENING CASE; OF TRANSFER

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case was dismissed when the Court did not receive a complaint or IFP application from Plaintiff. Very soon thereafter, the Court received a complaint and IFP application. In light of Plaintiff's incarceration and pro se status, the delay is excused. The dismissal and judgment are VACATED, and the case is REOPENED.

Plaintiff complains about events that occurred at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP”), where the Defendants are located. KVSP is locates within the venue of the Eastern District of California. Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of California, which is the proper venue for this case. Ruling on Plaintiff's IFP motion is deferred to the Eastern District.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Singh v. Pheiffer

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
22-cv-02393-JSW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Singh v. Pheiffer

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MANJEET SINGH, Plaintiff, v. PHEIFFER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

Citations

22-cv-02393-JSW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)