From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Napolitano

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 11, 2009
577 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 07-16988.

August 11, 2009.

James Todd Bennett, El Cerrito, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Edward Alan Olsen, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

D.C. No. CV-07-03943-MMC, Northern District of California, San Francisco.

Before J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, JEROME FARRIS and M. MARGARET McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for the limited purpose of ruling upon whether the Board had jurisdiction to hear Singh's ineffective assistance of counsel claims and what effect, if any, the Attorney General's recent opinion in In re Compean, 25 I N Dec. 1, 3 (A.G. 2009), has on this case. The Board shall advise this court of any action or decision.


Summaries of

Singh v. Napolitano

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 11, 2009
577 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Singh v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:Rajinder Pal SINGH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 11, 2009

Citations

577 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Singh v. Napolitano

The Board shall advise this court of any action or decision.Singh v. Napolitano, 577 F.3d 988, 988-89 (9th…

Singh v. Holder

The Court remanded the case to the BIA "for the limited purpose of ruling upon whether the Board had…