Opinion
No. 10-71489 Agency No. A099-873-204 Agency No. A099-873-205 Agency No. A099-873-206
04-15-2014
PARVINDER SINGH; KAWALJEET KAUR SACHDEVA; JAPNEET SINGH,Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 8, 2014
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------
Seattle, Washington
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The BIA didn't err in adopting the immigration judge's adverse credibility finding. The immigration judge listed "specific instances in the record that form[ed] the basis of the . . . adverse credibility determination," Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010), including Singh's voluntary return to India, discrepancies between the affidavits of Singh and his father, and petitioners' inconsistent testimony regarding their place of residence and visa application process. Nothing in the record "compels a contrary conclusion." Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir. 2006).
DENIED.