From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 27, 2012
472 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-2270

04-27-2012

DALJIT SINGH, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

Daljit Singh, Petitioner Pro Se. Ada Elsie Bosque, Matthew Allan Spurlock, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition for review denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daljit Singh, Petitioner Pro Se. Ada Elsie Bosque, Matthew Allan Spurlock, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daljit Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Singh (B.I.A. Oct. 21, 2011). We also deny the Attorney General's pending motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

Singh v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 27, 2012
472 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Singh v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:DALJIT SINGH, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

472 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Djondo v. Holder

Djadjou, 662 F.3d at 274. The REAL ID Act, however, changed this standard, removing this materiality…